FreeRTOS Support Archive
The FreeRTOS support forum is used to obtain active support directly from Real
Time Engineers Ltd. In return for using our top quality software and services for
free, we request you play fair and do your bit to help others too! Sign up
to receive notifications of new support topics then help where you can.
This is a read only archive of threads posted to the FreeRTOS support forum.
The archive is updated every week, so will not always contain the very latest posts.
Use these archive pages to search previous posts. Use the Live FreeRTOS Forum
link to reply to a post, or start a new support thread.
[FreeRTOS Home] [Live FreeRTOS Forum] [FAQ] [Archive Top] [September 2015 Threads]
Hi all,
I'm using ST's CubeMX implementation on a F4 discovery board. I use ST's USB middlewares with FreeRTOS.
When I get a special OutputReport from PC side I have to answer nearly immediately (in 10-15 ms). Currently I cannot achieve this timing and it seems my high priority tasks can interrupt the USB callback. What do you think, is it possible? Because it's generated code I'm not sure but can I increase the priority of the USB interrupt (if there is any)?
Thank you,
David
10 to 15 ms is very slow, so I'm sure its possible.
Where is the USB callback function called from? If it is an interrupt then it cannot be interrupted by high priority RTOS tasks. Any non interrupt code (whether you are using an RTOS or not) can only run if no interrupts are running.
Without knowing the control flow in your application its hard to know what to suggest. How is the OutputReport communicated to you? By an interrupt, a message from another task, or some other way?
The callback which receive the data from PC is called from the OTGFSIRQHandler (it's the part of the HALPCDIRQHandler function). I think the problem is SysTickHandler's priority is higher than OTGFSIRQHandler and it's cannot be modified, but the scheduler shouldn't interrupt the OTGFSIRQHandler with any task handled by the scheduler. Am I wrong that the scheduler can interrupt the OTGFS_IRQHandler?
fwdlmgr.exe is a non-essential but functional component of the Toshiba user experience. It is classified as provided it resides in the correct directory ( C:\Program Files\TOSHIBA\FlashCards\ ). Users encountering performance issues should prioritize updating Toshiba drivers before considering disabling the process. Users suspecting malware should immediately scan the file location with antivirus software.
There is a poetic irony in the existence of such files. We spend our lives interacting with the "user interface," a colorful layer of abstraction designed to hide the complexity beneath. is a reminder that beneath our touchscreens and glass displays, there is a frantic, complex dance of binary negotiation happening at the speed of light. It represents the "Ghost in the Machine"—the tireless, automated effort required to maintain the illusion of a seamless digital experience.
The secret history of offers a unique glimpse into the unseen architecture of modern computing. The Silent Custodian
While the legitimate file is safe, malware authors often name their processes to mimic legitimate software. Users should verify the file's location and digital signature if suspicious behavior is observed.
Users sometimes report that fwdlmgr.exe causes the CPU to spike. This is usually due to a conflict with other utilities or corrupted driver files.
is a legitimate Windows executable file primarily associated with the Firmware Download Manager (or Firmware VersionUp Tool) , a utility developed by Fuji Xerox and Xerox for updating printer and multifunction device firmware . What is fwdlmgr.exe?
Here’s a list of you could use:
If you have downloaded a firmware update for your Xerox or Fujifilm printer, follow these standard steps to use the utility:
Legitimate versions are digitally signed by Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. . How to Use fwdlmgr.exe for Firmware Updates
Thank you for the answer, I think I'm a bit confused with the Cortex ISR priorities :-)
What I can observe is if I use a much higher osDelay in my high priority task I can respond for the received USB message much faster. This is why I think tasks can mess up with my OTG interrupt.
Copyright (C) Amazon Web Services, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved.